Sepsis & infection

Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The MERCY Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMAPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.96 95% CI 0.81–1.13

Authors' conclusion

In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28.

Study context

Population
Critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock prescribed meropenem, 31 ICUs of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Russia)all included in primary analysis
Participants
607 patients
Comparison
Continuous vs intermittent meropenem administration
  • Continuous administrationn = 303
  • Intermittent administrationn = 304reference
Primary endpoint
Composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria
Follow-up
Day 28
Methodological detailsdouble-blind, multicentre, Only 1 crossover event recorded, Enrolled June 5, 2018–August 9, 2022; 90-day follow-up completed November 2022
  • Double-blind
  • Multicentre
  • Only 1 crossover event recorded
  • Enrolled June 5, 2018–August 9, 2022; 90-day follow-up completed November 2022

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.96

95% CI 0.81–1.13

P = 0.60

Events by treatment group

Continuous administration vs Intermittent administration
RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.81–1.13); P = 0.60

Secondary outcomes

All-cause mortality · 90 days

4 secondary outcomes (days alive and free from antibiotics and from ICU at day 28, all-cause mortality at day 90)

None statistically significant

Safety

No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug reported

Original publication

Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The MERCY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Published 11 July 2023. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.10598

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.