Safety, quality & education

Norwegian Anaesthesiologist's Perspectives on Perioperative Allergies and Penicillin Allergy Evaluations: A National Survey

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

Distrust in penicillin allergy evaluation procedures is prevalent among Norwegian anaesthesiologists.

Study context

Population
Members of the Norwegian Anaesthesiology Association24% response rate
Participants
405 members
Outcome
Attitudes to and barriers to penicillin allergy evaluation
Methodological detailsnational, online survey, Survey of 1667 members; informed by the British Drug Allergy Labels in Elective Surgical Patients anaesthesiologist survey; quantitative data analysed descriptively, qualitative data by systematic text condensation
  • National
  • Online survey
  • Survey of 1667 members; informed by the British Drug Allergy Labels in Elective Surgical Patients anaesthesiologist survey; quantitative data analysed descriptively, qualitative data by systematic text condensation

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Would administer penicillin if declared allergy believed highly unlikely to be true allergy

65%

Would still not re-expose patients de-labelled by oral provocation testing to penicillins

34%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Norwegian Anaesthesiologist's Perspectives on Perioperative Allergies and Penicillin Allergy Evaluations: A National Survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 30 September 2025. doi:10.1111/aas.70129

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.