ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

Palliative prognostic tools in surgical patients at the end of life: a systematic review

Br J AnaesthPublished Systematic review

Authors' conclusion

Palliative prognostic tools have significant potential for incorporation into preoperative assessment.

Study context

Population
Adult surgical patients assessed with palliative prognostic tools (PPTs)7 studies · 4 PPTs
Outcome
Decision to proceed to surgery
Methodological detailsprospectively registered, narrative synthesis, Results synthesised narratively owing to study heterogeneity
  • Prospectively registered
  • Narrative synthesis
  • Results synthesised narratively owing to study heterogeneity

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

  • Impact of PPTs on decisions to proceed to surgery uncertain because of conflicting results

Further pooled results

Proportion of surgical patients at the end of life (EOL)

Surgical patients at the EOL
12-61%

In-hospital and 12-month mortality

Increased in-hospital and 12-month mortality in patients identified at the EOL by a PPT using an illness phase, trajectory approach, or both

Palliative care referral and EOL document completion

Palliative care referral and EOL document completion in surgical patients at the EOL
<15%

Patient-reported outcomes

No studies described patient-reported outcomes

Original publication

Palliative prognostic tools in surgical patients at the end of life: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. Published 23 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.03.008

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.