Perioperative medicine & outcomes
Patient-reported outcome measures-guided perioperative care versus standard of care in postoperative recovery: Randomised controlled trial in orthopaedic surgery
Primary resultResult — go to the resultMean difference 5.5 points 95% CI 2.3–9.2Authors' conclusion
PROMs-guided postoperative care resulted in a nonclinically relevant increase in POD 35 health status measured by the QoR-15 scale and decreased persistent opioid consumption compared with standard of care.
Study context
- Population
- Adults admitted for osteoarticular surgery, tertiary French university hospital
- Participants
- 280 adults
- Comparison
- Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs)-guided perioperative care vs usual care
- Primary endpoint
- Change in modified French QoR-15 between preoperative period and POD 35 (MCID 6 points)
- Follow-up
- POD 35
Methodological detailssingle centre, prospective, open, pragmatic, Bayesian analysis
- Single centre
- Prospective
- Open
- Pragmatic
- Bayesian analysis
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Mean difference
5.5 points
95% CI 2.3–9.2
Experimental vs Control
mean difference 5.5 points (95% CI 2.3–9.2)
Secondary outcomes
Persistent opioid consumption · 5 weeks
- Persistent opioid consumption — Probability that RR of persistent opioid consumption is less than 1
- 97.4%
Original publication
Patient-reported outcome measures-guided perioperative care versus standard of care in postoperative recovery: Randomised controlled trial in orthopaedic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. Published 9 June 2026. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →