Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Performance of administrative database frailty instruments in predicting clinical outcomes and cost for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a historical cohort study

Can J AnaesthPublished Historical cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Preoperative frailty assessment may add some predictive value for TAVI outcomes.

Study context

Population
Patients aged 66 yr or older undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Ontario, Canada, 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2018
Participants
3,848 patients
Exposure
Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) frailty indicator and Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) vs reference model
Outcome
Performance in predicting in-hospital mortality, one-year mortality, rehospitalization and healthcare costs

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of one-year mortality and rehospitalization (NRI) and one-year costs
Each group vs reference modelRelative risk (95% CI)
Johns Hopkins ACG frailty indicatorassociation of frailty with one-year costs
1.13(1.06–1.20)
HFRSassociation of frailty with one-year costs
1.14(1.07–1.21)
Johns Hopkins ACG frailty indicator · one-year mortality
Net reclassification index (NRI) 0.160; P < 0.001
HFRS · one-year mortality
NRI 0.146; P = 0.001
Johns Hopkins ACG frailty indicator · rehospitalization
NRI 0.201; P < 0.001
HFRS · rehospitalization
NRI 0.141; P = 0.001
Johns Hopkins ACG frailty indicator · one-year mortality
Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) 0.003; P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeJohns Hopkins ACG frailty indicatorHFRS
Frail patients identified22.4%22.5%

Agreement between frailty instruments

Fair agreement between the frailty instruments (Kappa statistic)
0.322
Each instrument classified different subgroups as frail

Original publication

Performance of administrative database frailty instruments in predicting clinical outcomes and cost for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. Published 28 December 2022. doi:10.1007/s12630-022-02354-6

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.