Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis

Crit CarePublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Pooled result · Combined in-hospital and 30-day mortality, unadjustedResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 1.35 95% CI 1.26–1.44

Authors' conclusion

Even when adjusted for confounders, mortality for cardiogenic shock in women is approximately 10% higher than men. This effect is seen in both acute myocardial infarction and heart failure cardiogenic shock. Women with cardiogenic shock are less likely to be treated with mechanical circulatory support than men.

Study context

Population
Adults with cardiogenic shock81 studies
Participants
656,754 vs 1,018,036
Comparison
Women vs men
  • Womenn = 656,754
  • Menn = 1,018,036reference
Outcome
Combined in-hospital and 30-day mortality
Follow-up
30-day
Methodological detailsepidemiological meta-analysis, Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE searched April 2024; 4448 studies identified
  • Epidemiological meta-analysis
  • Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE searched April 2024; 4448 studies identified

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Combined in-hospital and 30-day mortality, unadjusted

Odds ratio

1.35

95% CI 1.26–1.44

P < 0.001

By group

Women vs Men
OR 1.35 (95% CI 1.26–1.44); P < 0.001

Further pooled results

OutcomeOR (95% CI)P value
Combined in-hospital/30-day mortality, studies reporting adjusted ORsAdjusted1.10 (1.06–1.15)P < 0.001
Mechanical circulatory support use0.67 (0.57–0.79)P < 0.001
Intra-aortic balloon pump use0.79 (0.71–0.89)P < 0.001
ECMO use0.84 (0.71–0.99)P = 0.045

Mortality, AMI- and HF-related cardiogenic shock (subgroups)

Effects remained consistent across subgroups of acute myocardial infarction- and HF-related cardiogenic shock

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis. Crit Care. Published 6 June 2024. doi:10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.