Smallest Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Amputation-Related Pain and Brief Pain Inventory Scores as Defined by Patient Reports of Global Improvement After Cryoneurolysis: a Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Authors' conclusion
Amputees with phantom limb pain treated with percutaneous cryoneurolysis rate analgesic improvements as clinically meaningful similar to pharmacologic treatments, although their MCID for the Brief Pain Inventory was somewhat larger than previously published values.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with a lower-limb amputation and established phantom pain
- Participants
- 144 patients
- Comparison
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis vs sham treatment
- Primary endpoint
- Phantom limb pain (NRS) and Brief Pain Inventory interference subscale scores
- Follow-up
- 4 months
Methodological detailsretrospective analysis, multicentre, masked, sham-controlled, anchor-based method
- Retrospective analysis
- Multicentre
- Masked
- Sham-controlled
- Anchor-based method
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
MCID by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) anchor
- Phantom pain numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) improvement, small change, median [IQR]
- 1 [1-1]
- Phantom pain NRS (0-10) improvement, medium change, median [IQR]
- 3 [3-4]
- Phantom pain NRS (0-10) improvement, large change, median [IQR]
- 4 [3-6]
- Brief Pain Inventory interference (0-70) improvement, small change, median [IQR]
- 16 [6-18]
- Brief Pain Inventory interference (0-70) improvement, medium change, median [IQR]
- 24 [22-31]
- Brief Pain Inventory interference (0-70) improvement, large change, median [IQR]
- 34 [22-46]
Further findings
| Outcome | Active | Sham | RR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGIC ≥5 | 33% | 36% | 0.9 (0.6–1.4) | P = 0.667 | |
| 0.512Relative risk (log scale) |
Original publication
Smallest Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Amputation-Related Pain and Brief Pain Inventory Scores as Defined by Patient Reports of Global Improvement After Cryoneurolysis: a Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. Published 15 November 2024. doi:10. 1213/ ane. 0000000000006833
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →