Pain medicine

Smallest Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Amputation-Related Pain and Brief Pain Inventory Scores as Defined by Patient Reports of Global Improvement After Cryoneurolysis: a Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Anesth AnalgPublished Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Amputees with phantom limb pain treated with percutaneous cryoneurolysis rate analgesic improvements as clinically meaningful similar to pharmacologic treatments, although their MCID for the Brief Pain Inventory was somewhat larger than previously published values.

Study context

Population
Patients with a lower-limb amputation and established phantom pain
Participants
144 patients
Comparison
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis vs sham treatment
Primary endpoint
Phantom limb pain (NRS) and Brief Pain Inventory interference subscale scores
Follow-up
4 months
Methodological detailsretrospective analysis, multicentre, masked, sham-controlled, anchor-based method
  • Retrospective analysis
  • Multicentre
  • Masked
  • Sham-controlled
  • Anchor-based method

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

MCID by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) anchor
Phantom pain numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) improvement, small change, median [IQR]
1 [1-1]
Phantom pain NRS (0-10) improvement, medium change, median [IQR]
3 [3-4]
Phantom pain NRS (0-10) improvement, large change, median [IQR]
4 [3-6]
Brief Pain Inventory interference (0-70) improvement, small change, median [IQR]
16 [6-18]
Brief Pain Inventory interference (0-70) improvement, medium change, median [IQR]
24 [22-31]
Brief Pain Inventory interference (0-70) improvement, large change, median [IQR]
34 [22-46]

Further findings

OutcomeActiveShamRR (95% CI)P value
PGIC ≥533%36%0.9 (0.6–1.4)P = 0.667

Original publication

Smallest Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Amputation-Related Pain and Brief Pain Inventory Scores as Defined by Patient Reports of Global Improvement After Cryoneurolysis: a Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. Published 15 November 2024. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006833

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.