Hemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

SvO₂ response to red blood cell transfusion in cardiovascular surgical icu patients: a retrospective observational study

Crit CarePublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · SvO₂ responseResult — go to the resultAdjusted odds ratio 0.89 95% CI 0.86–0.91

Authors' conclusion

Lower pre-transfusion SvO₂ was associated with acute individual-level SvO₂ increase after transfusion, but mean SvO₂ change was minimal. The association did not establish tissue oxygenation or clinical benefit and does not support using SvO₂, including the 69% cutoff, as a transfusion indication or trigger.

Study context

Population
Adult cardiovascular surgical ICU patients receiving one red blood cell (RBC)-equivalent transfusion with pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 7.5 g/dL and paired pre- and post-transfusion SvO₂
Participants
1,352 patients
Exposure
SvO₂ before vs ≈60 min after one RBC-equivalent transfusion
Outcome
Individual-level SvO₂ response (ΔSvO₂ ≥5% points from baseline), defined a priori
Follow-up
≈60 min after transfusion initiation
Methodological detailssingle-center
  • Single-center

Main finding

SvO₂ response

Adjusted odds ratio

0.89

95% CI 0.86–0.91

P < 0.001

Pre-transfusion SvO₂ (per 1% increase)
aOR 0.89 (95% CI 0.86–0.91); P < 0.001

Per 1% increase, as printed

As reported in the abstract

AUC of pre-transfusion SvO₂ for SvO₂ response
0.778 (95% CI 0.740-0.816)
Youden-derived cutoff of pre-transfusion SvO₂ (exploratory, not a transfusion trigger)
69%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Hb, pre- vs post-transfusion

Mean Hb increased from 9.82 ± 0.92 to 10.24 ± 0.98 g/dL

SvO₂, cohort level, pre- vs post-transfusion

Mean SvO₂ changed minimally, from 73.79 ± 9.91% to 73.86 ± 9.37%

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

SvO₂ response to red blood cell transfusion in cardiovascular surgical icu patients: a retrospective observational study. Crit Care. Published 22 June 2026. doi:10.1186/s13054-026-06149-9

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.