ICU sedation, delirium & recovery
The healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences with family presence during resuscitation: A qualitative evidence synthesis
Authors' conclusion
The evidence on HCP perspectives is of low to moderate confidence. The interviewed consent that FPDR is the "right thing to do", and an ethical principle of beneficence is dominant, especially regarding children.
Study context
- Population
- Healthcare professionals (HCP) with experience of family presence during resuscitation (FPDR); studies from Australia, UK and USA, 2005–2019
- Participants
- 134 professionals · 9 studies
- Outcome
- HCP perspectives on barriers and facilitating factors of FPDR and its potential impact on HCP performance
Methodological detailssystematic literature search, thematic synthesis, GRADE CERQual, Quality appraisal by Critical Appraisal Skills Program, Systematic literature search May 17, 2023; 8241 articles screened, 141 full text, 9 studies included
- Systematic literature search
- Thematic synthesis
- GRADE CERQual
- Quality appraisal by Critical Appraisal Skills Program
- Systematic literature search May 17, 2023; 8241 articles screened, 141 full text, 9 studies included
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
HCP perspectives on FPDR
Analytical themes identified ("Facilitating factors for FPDR", "Barriers for FPDR", "How staff are affected by FPDR")
3
Descriptive subthemes
8
Original publication
The healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences with family presence during resuscitation: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 5 September 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →