Safety, quality & education

Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial access—Protocol of a scoping review

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Protocol of a scoping review

Study context

Population
Physicians, medical students or nurses exposed to education, training or assessment in procedural neuraxial access ± ultrasound
Methodological detailsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews, PICO-based systematic search, independent screening by two authors, Descriptive analysis of predefined data, Search in Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PubMed and CINAHL, Outcomes assessable by the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation, Quality assessed with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument
  • PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews
  • PICO-based systematic search
  • Independent screening by two authors
  • Descriptive analysis of predefined data
  • Search in Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, Scopus, PubMed and CINAHL
  • Outcomes assessable by the Kirkpatrick four levels of training evaluation
  • Quality assessed with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Original publication

Training and assessment of skills in neuraxial access—Protocol of a scoping review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 25 June 2024. doi:10.1111/aas.14483

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.