Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Treatment and outcome variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among four urban hospitals in Detroit

ResuscitationPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Differing rates of DNR and coronary angiography was associated with observed disparities in favorable neurologic outcome, but not death, between four Detroit hospitals.

Study context

Population
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients at four urban Detroit hospitals, Detroit-Cardiac Arrest Registry, January 2014 to December 2019
Participants
999 patients
Exposure
Hospital A vs Hospitals B, C and D
Outcome
Treatments (coronary angiography, new DNR status) and outcomes (CPC ≤ 2, in-hospital death)
Methodological detailsregistry-based, multicentre
  • Registry-based
  • Multicentre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

OR

Hospital A vs B · coronary angiography, adjusted
0.17
Hospital A vs B · new do not resuscitate (DNR) status, adjusted
2.9
Hospital A vs C · new DNR status, adjusted
16.1
Hospital A vs D · new DNR status, adjusted
3.6
Hospital A vs B · cerebral performance category (CPC) ≤ 2, adjusted
0.27
Hospital A vs D · CPC ≤ 2, adjusted
0.35
Hospital A vs B · in-hospital death
1.87
Hospital A vs D · in-hospital death
1.81

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeOR
CPC ≤ 2, sensitivity analysisHospital A vs B · adjusted for angiography; did not differ0.58
CPC ≤ 2, sensitivity analysisHospital A vs D · adjusted for DNR; did not differ0.65

Original publication

Treatment and outcome variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest among four urban hospitals in Detroit. Resuscitation. Published 11 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109731

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.