Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase L1 after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Secondary analysis of the FINNRESUSCI study

Authors' conclusion

Concentrations of UCH-L1 in serum were higher in patients with unfavourable outcome than in those with favourable outcome. However, the ability of UCH-L1 to predict unfavourable outcome after OHCA was only moderate and not superior to that of NSE.

Study context

Population
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated in 21 Finnish ICUs in 2010–2011
Participants
249 patients · 21 Finnish ICUs
Comparison
Serum UCH-L1 vs neuron-specific enolase (NSE) for predicting unfavourable outcome at 12 months
Primary endpoint
Prediction of unfavourable outcome (cerebral performance category 3-5) by AUROC
Follow-up
12 months
Methodological detailsdiagnostic accuracy, post-hoc analysis, multicentre
  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Post-hoc analysis
  • Multicentre

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

AUROC for unfavourable 12-month outcome
GroupAUC at 24 hAUC at 48 h
UCH-L10.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.73)0.66 (0.59-0.74)
NSE0.66 (0.59-0.73)0.72 (0.65-0.80)

AUC at 24 h

UCH-L10.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.73)
NSE0.66 (0.59-0.73)

AUC at 48 h

UCH-L10.66 (0.59-0.74)
NSE0.72 (0.65-0.80)
  • UCH-L1 vs NSE: P = 0.82 — not different
  • UCH-L1 vs NSE: P = 0.23 — not different

Further findings

Serum UCH-L1 concentration, unfavourable vs favourable outcome · 24 h

P < 0.001

Serum UCH-L1 concentration, unfavourable vs favourable outcome · 48 h

P < 0.001

Original publication

Ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase L1 after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published 28 April 2023. doi:10.1111/aas.14257

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.