Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Validation of the rCAST score and comparison to the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC) and Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scores for prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

ResuscitationPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

The rCAST score can reliably predict poor outcome in a United States cohort of OHCA patients regardless of TTM status and outperforms the PCAC score.

Study context

Population
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients admitted January 2014–August 2022, US single centreall scores available
Participants
505 patients
Exposure
rCAST vs PCAC vs FOUR scores for prognostication
Outcome
Prediction (AUC) of poor neurologic outcome and in-hospital mortality
Follow-up
Discharge
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Poor neurologic outcome
GroupAUC
rCAST0.815 [0.763-0.867]
PCAC0.753 [0.697-0.809]
FOUR0.841 [0.796-0.886]

AUC

rCAST0.815 [0.763-0.867]
PCAC0.753 [0.697-0.809]
FOUR0.841 [0.796-0.886]
  • FOUR vs PCAC: P < 0.001 — FOUR superior

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomerCASTPCACFOURP value
In-hospital mortalityrCAST vs PCAC · rCAST superiorP = 0.017
AUC0.799 [0.751-0.847]0.723 [0.673-0.773]0.813 [0.770-0.855]
In-hospital mortalityFOUR vs PCAC · FOUR superiorP < 0.001
Score valuesMedian9.5 (IQR 6.0–11.5)4 (IQR 3–4)2 (IQR 0–5)
  • In-hospital mortality: AUC 95% CI

Original publication

Validation of the rCAST score and comparison to the PCAC and FOUR scores for prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. Published 11 May 2023. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109832

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.