Trauma & major bleeding

Addressing barriers to the implementation of an Acute Pain Service rib fracture pathway: effect on quality and outcomes of care for trauma patients

Reg Anesth Pain MedPublished Quality improvement project with retrospective observational pre-post evaluation

Authors' conclusion

The implementation of an Acute Pain Service rib fracture analgesic pathway at a tertiary care trauma center did not substantially increase the proportion of patients who received a regional catheter for analgesia or lead to improvements in clinical outcomes.

Study context

Population
High-risk rib fracture patients (Rib Fracture Score ≥6), tertiary care trauma center, July 2018–June 2023
Exposure
Post-pathway vs pre-pathway
Outcome
Delivery of regional analgesia (truncal block or epidural)
Methodological detailssingle-centre, run charts, pre-post comparison
  • Single-centre
  • Run charts
  • Pre-post comparison

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Use of regional analgesia

P = 0.195

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Acute Pain Service consult rates

Acute Pain Service consult rates increased from 46.7% to 49.6% after pathway implementation
  • p=0.37

Clinical outcomes

No improvements in clinical outcomes

Original publication

Addressing barriers to the implementation of an Acute Pain Service rib fracture pathway: effect on quality and outcomes of care for trauma patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. Published 29 April 2025. doi:10.1136/rapm-2024-106326

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.