ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

Adjuvant nefopam versus standard of care in mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients: A randomized, double-blind controlled study

Anaesth Crit Care Pain MedPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Nefopam was found to be an effective non-opioid option for analgesia in mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma critically ill patients

Study context

Population
Mechanically ventilated ICU patients who are candidates for analgesia and sedation protocolsincluded in final analysis
Participants
60 participants
Comparison
Adjunct nefopam infusion vs standard-of-care analgesia and sedation
  • Interventionn = 30
  • Controln = 30reference
Primary endpoint
Cumulative dose of fentanyl
Follow-up
First 24 h after inclusion
Methodological detailsprospective, active control, double-blind
  • Prospective
  • Active control
  • Double-blind

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Cumulative fentanyl consumption · 24 h

P = 0.001

Secondary outcomes

ICU mortality

P = 0.136

Pain and sedation scores

Comparable between the two groups

Original publication

Adjuvant nefopam versus standard of care in mechanically ventilated surgical critically ill patients: A randomized, double-blind controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. Published 16 April 2025. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2025.101518

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.