Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Applied forces with direct versus indirect laryngoscopy in neonatal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study

Can J AnaesthPublished Randomised crossover trial

Authors' conclusion

The lower force applied during videolaryngoscopy in a neonatal mannequin model suggests a possible benefit in reducing potential patient harm during intubation

Study context

Population
Neonatal/pediatric/anesthesiology consultants and residents intubating a neonatal mannequinconsultants and residents
Participants
30 consultants
Comparison
Straight blade and hyperangulated videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy
Primary endpoint
Maximum peak force applied during intubation
Methodological detailsmannequin study
  • Mannequin study

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Maximum peak force on the epiglottis

Secondary outcomes

Average peak force on the epiglottis

Average peak force on the epiglottis

Differences significant between direct laryngoscopy and each videolaryngoscopy

Top 10th percentile forces on epiglottis and palate; median forces on palate

Significant differences in top 10th percentile forces on epiglottis and palate, not in median forces on palate

Time to intubation and subjective workload

Comparable with videolaryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy

Original publication

Applied forces with direct versus indirect laryngoscopy in neonatal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study. Can J Anaesth. Published 14 February 2023. doi:10.1007/s12630-023-02402-9

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.