Cardiac arrest & resuscitation

Automated external defibrillator electrode size and termination of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

ResuscitationPublished Prospective before-and-after clinical study

Main finding · VF termination by a single 200-J shockResult — go to the resultDifference 3% 95% CI −3% −9%

Authors' conclusion

For AEDs with impedance-compensating BTE waveforms, TTI was higher for smaller electrodes than the large electrode electrodes. Overall defibrillation shock success for AEDs with smaller electrodes was non-inferior to the AEDs with larger electrodes.

Study context

Population
OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm treated by Amsterdam police and firefighters with automated external defibrillator (AEDs)
Participants
157 vs 178
Exposure
Smaller vs larger AED electrodes
  • Large electrodesn = 157reference
  • Small electrodesn = 178
Outcome
First-shock defibrillation success (single 200-J shock terminating ventricular fibrillation (VF))
Methodological detailsnon-inferiority
  • Non-inferiority

Main finding

VF termination by a single 200-J shock

Difference

3%

95% CI −3% −9%

By group

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP value
Transthoracic impedance (TTI)TTI significantly higher with smaller electrodesP < 0.001

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Automated external defibrillator electrode size and termination of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. Published 25 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109754

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.