Neuroanesthesia & neurocritical care

Autoregulation-guided intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets in different subtypes and characteristics of traumatic brain injury

Crit CarePublished Prospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

This study provides novel insights into cerebral physiology across various TBI subtypes by delineating safe and hazardous thresholds for ICP, PRx, and CPP. The acceptable lower limit of CPP appears to be directly proportional to the PRx.

Study context

Population
Patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) with intracranial pressure (ICP) and arterial BP monitoring and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) outcome
Participants
187 patients
Exposure
Associations of PRx with ICP or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and their combined relation to 6-month functional outcome
Outcome
Functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended)
Follow-up
6 months

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Composite variable 2 the only variable independently associated with favorable outcome in the multivariable model: OR

1.026

95% CI 1.006–1.046P = 0.012

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Tolerance to lower CPP by subgroup (decompressive craniectomy (DC), injury type, age)

Patients without DC, with diffuse injury or younger age tolerated lower CPP better when autoregulation was preserved than patients with DC, focal injury or older age

Original publication

Autoregulation-guided intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets in different subtypes and characteristics of traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. Published 20 April 2026. doi:10.1186/s13054-026-06030-9

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.