Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Bispectral Index–guided Anesthesia for Older Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery: A Randomized Multicenter Trial

AnesthesiologyPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 1.02 95% CI 0.88–1.17

Authors' conclusion

Hypnotic depth, as assessed by BIS, was similar in patients with or without BIS-guided anesthetic titration.

Study context

Population
Patients aged 65 yr or older scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery (ASA I to IV), 21 tertiary-care hospitals in China, 2015–2022
Participants
6,982 patients
Comparison
BIS-guided vs routine anesthetic management
  • BIS-guidedn = 3,485
  • Routinen = 3,497reference
Primary endpoint
All-cause mortality
Follow-up
1 yr
Methodological detailsdouble-blind, multicentre, 1:1 randomisation
  • Double-blind
  • Multicentre
  • 1:1 randomisation

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

1.02

95% CI 0.88–1.17

P = 0.812

Events by treatment group

BIS-guided vs Routine
HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.88–1.17); P = 0.812

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeBIS-guidedRoutineRR (95% CI)P value
Complications · 30 days10.4%10.6%0.99 (0.85–1.16)P = 0.938
OutcomeBIS-guidedRoutine
BIS valuesAveraged4746

Functional independence and quality of life

No significant differences

Original publication

Bispectral Index–guided Anesthesia for Older Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery: A Randomized Multicenter Trial. Anesthesiology. Published 25 September 2025. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000005770

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.