Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Cardiac index-guided therapy to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index in high-risk patients having major open abdominal surgery: the multicentre randomised iPEGASUS trial

Br J AnaesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 1.87 95% CI 1.03–3.39

Authors' conclusion

Maintaining optimised postinduction cardiac index during and for the first 8 h after surgery did not reduce, and possibly increased, the incidence of a composite outcome of complications within 28 days after surgery compared with routine care in high-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery.

Study context

Population
High-risk patients having elective major open abdominal surgery, 3 German and 2 Spanish centres318 analysed
Participants
380 patients
Comparison
Cardiac index-guided therapy vs routine care
  • Cardiac index-guided therapyn = 152
  • Routine caren = 166reference
Primary endpoint
Composite of:
  • Moderate
  • Severe complications
Follow-up
Within 28 days after surgery
Methodological detailsmulticentre
  • Multicentre

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Odds ratio

1.87

95% CI 1.03–3.39

P = 0.038

Events by treatment group

Cardiac index-guided therapy vs Routine care
OR 1.87 (95% CI 1.03–3.39); P = 0.038

Further findings

Per-protocol analyses confirmed the results of the primary outcome analysis

Original publication

Cardiac index-guided therapy to maintain optimised postinduction cardiac index in high-risk patients having major open abdominal surgery: the multicentre randomised iPEGASUS trial. Br J Anaesth. Published 26 May 2024. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.040

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.