Sepsis & infection

Can carotid artery Doppler variations induced by the end-expiratory occlusion maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients?

Crit CarePublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

In septic shock patients without arrhythmias, an increase in CDPV greater than 10.5% during a 20-s EEOt predicted fluid responsiveness with > 95% specificity.

Study context

Population
Mechanically ventilated adults with septic shock without arrhythmias44 measurements
Participants
18 participants
Comparison
Carotid Doppler changes during end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOt) vs CI changes for predicting fluid responsiveness
Outcome
Prediction of fluid responsiveness (CI increase ≥ 15% after 500 mL fluid challenge) by CDPV and cFT changes during a 20-s EEOt
Methodological detailsprospective, single-centre
  • Prospective
  • Single-centre

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Prediction of fluid responsiveness
Test or modelAUCSensitivitySpecificity
CI0.8578.9%91.7%
CD peak velocity (CDPV)0.7453.0%96.2%

AUC

CI0.85
CD peak velocity (CDPV)0.74

Sensitivity

CI78.9%
CD peak velocity (CDPV)53.0%

Specificity

CI91.7%
CD peak velocity (CDPV)96.2%
CDPV measurements within the gray zone (from - 13.5 to 9.5 cm/s)
61%

Further findings

Correlation with CI changes during EEOt

CDPV changes vs CI changes, r (0.26-0.71)
0.51
Corrected flow time (cFT) changes vs CI changes, r (0.1-0.58)
0.35

Original publication

Can carotid artery Doppler variations induced by the end-expiratory occlusion maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients? Crit Care. Published 19 April 2023. doi:10.1186/s13054-023-04422-9

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.