Obstetric anesthesia

Carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of uterine atony during cesarean delivery: a real-world retrospective historical control cohort study (2022–2023)

Int J Obstet AnesthPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main findingResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.53 95% CI 0.41–0.68

Authors' conclusion

In this single-center retrospective cohort, carbetocin was associated with reduced administration of additional uterotonics, a lower decrease in postoperative hemoglobin, and reduced transfusion compared with an oxytocin regimen of single bolus plus infusion during cesarean delivery.

Study context

Population
Consecutive women undergoing cesarean delivery at a single academic center
Participants
1,349 women
Exposure
Oxytocin vs Carbetocin
  • Oxytocinn = 659reference
  • Carbetocinn = 690
Outcome
Need for additional uterotonics
Methodological detailsbefore-and-after, historical control, single-centre
  • Before-and-after
  • Historical control
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Odds ratio

0.53

95% CI 0.41–0.68

P < 0.001

Events by group

Carbetocin vs Oxytocin
OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.41–0.68); P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

RBC transfusion

P = 0.030

Median, g/dL

OutcomeOxytocinCarbetocinDifference (g/dL)P value
Postoperative Hb decrease (within 24 ± 6 h)Uncertain clinical significance1.2 (IQR 0.6–2.0)1.0 (IQR 0.4–1.6)0.2P < 0.001

Original publication

Carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of uterine atony during cesarean delivery: a real-world retrospective historical control cohort study (2022–2023). Int J Obstet Anesth. Published 6 February 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2026.104871

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.