Respiratory failure & ventilation
Clinical evaluation of a smart wristband for monitoring oxygen saturation, pulse rate, and respiratory rate
Authors' conclusion
This study shows that photoplethysmography-based SpO2, RR, and PR measurements can be accurate during heart catheterisations.
Study context
- Population
- Patients undergoing heart catheterisations945 samples
- Participants
- 100 patients
- Comparison
- PPG-based wristband vs reference Nellcor fingerclip and 5-lead ECG
- Outcome
- Accuracy of SpO2, RR and PR vs reference (correlation coefficients and root mean squared error)
Performance
As reported in the abstract
Agreement of wristband vs reference measurements
| Test or model | SpO2 r | SpO2 root means squared error (RMSE) | RR r | RR RMSE | Pulse rate (PR) r | PR RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wristband | 0.815 | 1.6% | 0.976 | 0.9 brpm | 0.995 | 1.3 bpm |
Wristband
SpO2 r0.815
SpO2 root means squared error (RMSE)1.6%
RR r0.976
RR RMSE0.9 brpm
Pulse rate (PR) r0.995
PR RMSE1.3 bpm
Further findings
Skin colour and arm hair density subcategories (subgroup)
- Similar results across all skin colour and arm hair density subcategories
Original publication
Clinical evaluation of a smart wristband for monitoring oxygen saturation, pulse rate, and respiratory rate. J Clin Monit Comput. Published 10 October 2024. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →