Sepsis & infection

Clinical subphenotypes of sepsis based on mixed continuous and categorical data and differences in treatment effects: a cluster analysis of multicenter observational studies

Crit CarePublished Cluster analysis of multicentre observational studies

Authors' conclusion

Using three clustering methods on mixed-data sepsis cohorts, we identified three to five clinically distinct subphenotypes with heterogeneous treatment responses.

Study context

Population
Patients aged 16 years or older with sepsis admitted to ICUs in Japan (Tohoku Sepsis Registry and FORECAST study)
Participants
1,756 patients · 2 registries
Exposure
Treatment effects across sepsis subphenotypes derived by k-UMAP, k-prototype and KAMILA clustering of mixed data
Outcome
In-hospital mortality
Methodological detailsmulticentre registries, inverse probability of treatment weighting, consensus clustering, exploratory
  • Multicentre registries
  • Inverse probability of treatment weighting
  • Consensus clustering
  • Exploratory

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

In-hospital mortality, treatment effect by subphenotype
k-UMAP model
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Recombinant thrombomodulin, subphenotype 1 (three subphenotypes)
0.37(0.13–0.80)
Antithrombin III, subphenotype 2 (five subphenotypes)
0.49(0.20–0.93)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Clinical subphenotypes of sepsis based on mixed continuous and categorical data and differences in treatment effects: a cluster analysis of multicenter observational studies. Crit Care. Published 15 January 2026. doi:10.1186/s13054-025-05819-4

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.