Sepsis & infection

Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development

Crit CarePublished Retrospective multicohort validation and classifier development study

Authors' conclusion

The distribution and mortality rates of clinical sepsis subtypes varied between US and European cohorts. A three-variable model could accurately identify the δ-type sepsis patients.

Study context

Population
Critically ill ICU patients fulfilling Sepsis-3 criteria, 4 cohorts, 2008–2023
Participants
2,449 / 2,445 / 28,621 / 18,661
Comparison
SENECA clinical sepsis subtypes (α, β, γ, δ) across MARS, MARS study (MARS2), NICE and MIMIC-IV cohorts
  • MARSn = 2,449
  • MARS2n = 2,445
  • NICEn = 28,621
  • MIMIC-IVn = 18,661
Outcome
Validation of SENECA clinical sepsis subtypes and parsimonious classifier for δ-type
Methodological detailsK-means clustering, logistic regression parsimonious models, external validation
  • K-means clustering
  • Logistic regression parsimonious models
  • External validation

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Subtype distribution (α, β, γ, δ)

MIMIC-IV

25%, 24%, 27% and 25%

MARS, MARS2 and NICE: α-type
2-6%
MARS, MARS2 and NICE: β-type
1-5%
MARS, MARS2 and NICE: γ-type
49-65%
MARS, MARS2 and NICE: δ-type
26-48%
Original SENECA derivation cohort (α, β, γ, δ)
33%, 27%, 27% and 13%

Further findings

OutcomeMARSMIMIC-IV
3-variable classifier (aspartate aminotransferase, serum lactate, bicarbonate) for δ-type vs all other types
AUC0.930.86
AUC 95% CI0.92-0.94— not stated in the abstract
Accuracy85.5%82.9%
Accuracy CI84.0-86.8%82.4-83.4%
AUC CI— not stated in the abstract0.85-0.87

— not stated in the abstract

  • 3-variable classifier (aspartate aminotransferase, serum lactate, bicarbonate) for δ-type vs all other types: excellent accuracy in derivation cohort, moderate in validation cohorts

In-hospital mortality across cohorts for α, γ and δ-type

Significantly different between the four cohorts
P < 0.001

Parsimonious model for all four subtypes

Accuracy (moderate to low)
62.2%

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development. Crit Care. Published 4 February 2025. doi:10.1186/s13054-025-05256-3

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.