Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Comparison of a Besdata Video Laryngoscope With a Direct Laryngoscope in Neonates and Infants of 6 Months of Age—A Randomized Controlled Trial

Paediatr AnaesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

The Besdata video laryngoscope with a zero-size Miller blade has shown a similar intubation time when compared with a conventional laryngoscope in neonates and infants of 6 months of age.

Study context

Population
Neonates and infants 6 months of age scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation
Participants
80 neonates
Comparison
Besdata video laryngoscope vs direct laryngoscope

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Time taken for intubation
Median difference in intubation time
0.0 s [−4.0 to 5.0] (95% CI)
Similar in both groups
P = 0.35

Further findings

Median, s

OutcomeDLVLMedian difference (s) (95% CI)
Glottic visualization timeShorter time with video laryngoscope13.0 (IQR 10.0–15.5)10.0 (IQR 8.0–12.0)2.0 (1–6)

Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and need for external laryngeal manipulation

Better POGO scores and decreased need for optimal external laryngeal manipulation with VL

First attempt success rate and use of bougie

Similar in both groups

Safety

Complications

Similar in both groups

Original publication

Comparison of a Besdata Video Laryngoscope With a Direct Laryngoscope in Neonates and Infants of 6 Months of Age—A Randomized Controlled Trial. Paediatr Anaesth. Published 15 February 2025. doi:10.1111/pan.15083

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.