Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Comparison of Inhalational and Intravenous Anesthesia Induction on Electroencephalogram and Cerebral Perfusion in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

The administration of sevoflurane for anesthesia induction results in more burst suppression, while also demonstrating superior cerebral perfusion when compared with the use of intravenous medications for anesthesia induction.

Study context

Population
Children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery, 2 tertiary hospitals
Participants
116 children
Comparison
Inhalational vs intravenous anaesthesia induction
  • Inhalationaln = 58
  • Intravenousn = 58reference
Methodological detailsmulticentre
  • Multicentre

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

EEG and cerebral perfusion 10 min after tracheal intubation · Ten minutes after tracheal intubation
Inhalational vs Intravenous: significant increases in 95% spectral edge frequency, ratio of burst suppression event, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and cerebral oxygen saturation
p < 0.05 for all

Further findings

Hemodynamic parameters · Ten minutes after tracheal intubation

Inhalational vs Intravenous: decreases in systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, cardiac index and maximal slope of systolic upstroke
P < 0.05 for all

Original publication

Comparison of Inhalational and Intravenous Anesthesia Induction on Electroencephalogram and Cerebral Perfusion in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 22 October 2024. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.025

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.