Airway management

Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-gel and Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway as an Intubating Device in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anesth AnalgPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Pooled result · First-pass success rate for tracheal intubationResult — go to the resultRR for first-pass intubation success 0.81 95% CI 0.67–0.98

Authors' conclusion

Based on our findings, a higher first-pass success rate was observed with the use of Fastrach when compared to I-gel.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing intubation
Participants
1,340 adults · 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
I-gel vs Fastrach as intubating SGA
Outcome
First-pass success rate for tracheal intubation
Methodological detailsBonferroni correction for secondary outcomes (99% CI)
  • Bonferroni correction for secondary outcomes (99% CI)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

RR for first-pass intubation success

0.81

95% CI 0.67–0.98

P = 0.03

I-gel vs Fastrach
RR for first-pass intubation success 0.81 (95% CI 0.67–0.98); P = 0.03

Further pooled results

OutcomeRR for first-pass intubation success (95% CI)P value
First-pass success rate, flexible scope through I-gel (subgroup)I² = 0%; favouring I-gel with flexible scope1.05 (1.01–1.11)P = 0.03

Overall intubation success rate

No significant difference irrespective of the device used
RR 0.92; 0.82-1.04; P = .08; I² = 92% (99% CI, P, I²)
  • 99% CI after Bonferroni correction

Tracheal intubation time

No significant difference irrespective of the device used (WMD, seconds; 99% CI; P; I²)
- 1.03; −4.75 to 2.69; P = .48; I² = 84%
  • 99% CI after Bonferroni correction

Device insertion time

No significant difference regarding device insertion time
−6.48; −13.23 to 0.27; P = .01; I 2 = 98% (WMD, seconds; 99% CI; P; I²)
  • 99% CI after Bonferroni correction; P < .01 considered significant

Success rate of initial SGD insertion

No significant difference

Safety

Sore throat

No significant difference
1.01; 0.65-1.57; P = .95; I² = 33% (RR; 99% CI; P; I²)
  • 99% CI after Bonferroni correction

Blood presence post-SGD removal

No significant difference
0.89; 0.42-1.86; P = .68; I² = 0% (RR; 99% CI; P; I²)
  • 99% CI after Bonferroni correction

Original publication

Comparison of Clinical Performance of I-gel and Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway as an Intubating Device in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg. Published 10 January 2025. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000007000

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.