Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Flexible Bronchoscopy– or Video Laryngoscopy–Assisted Insertion Versus Blind Insertion of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe in Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Flexible bronchoscopy-assisted TEE probe insertion provides similar performance characteristics to video laryngoscopy-assisted insertion albeit with less hemodynamic perturbation and is superior to blind insertion of the TEE probe.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery124 completed
Participants
135 adults
Comparison
Flexible bronchoscopy- or video laryngoscopy-assisted vs blind transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe insertion
  • Bn = 45reference
  • VLn = 45
  • FBn = 45
Primary endpoint
First-attempt success rate of TEE probe insertion
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

P = 0.042

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeP value
Time to probe insertionFB vs VL and B · significantly longer in FBP = 0.001
Number of attempts for successful insertionVL and FB vs B · significantly lower in visually assisted groupsP = 0.01

Increase in heart rate and MAP · immediately after and at 3 minutes after insertion

Significantly lower in FB vs VL and B; no difference between VL and B

Operator satisfaction

Comparable among the groups

Safety

OutcomeP value
Blood at the tip of the probeVL and FB vs B · significantly lower with visually guided techniquesP = 0.005
Probe-related injuriesVL and FB vs B · comparable across the groupsP = 0.09

Original publication

Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Flexible Bronchoscopy– or Video Laryngoscopy–Assisted Insertion Versus Blind Insertion of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe in Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 21 January 2026. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2026.01.026

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.