Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing Versus Paralyzed Technique During Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation in Anesthetized Children and Adolescents With Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis: Randomized Parallel Group Trial

Paediatr AnaesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary resultResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.06 95% CI 0.01–0.39

Authors' conclusion

Paralyzed technique is associated with lower incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation compared to spontaneously breathing technique in children and adolescents with temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Study context

Population
Children and adolescents up to 18 years with temporomandibular joint ankylosis and mouth opening < 1.5 cm scheduled for elective surgery
Participants
70 children
Comparison
Group P vs group S
Primary endpoint
Incidence of difficult flexible bronchoscopic intubation
Methodological detailsparallel group
  • Parallel group

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.06

95% CI 0.01–0.39

P < 0.001

Events by treatment group

Group P vs group S
RR 0.06 (95% CI 0.01–0.39); P < 0.001

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeMedian difference (sec) (CI)P value
Time to visualize the glottisLower in paralyzed group30 (24–36)P < 0.001
Time to the carinaLower in paralyzed group62 (29–94)P = 0.001
Time to intubationLower in paralyzed group97 (59–135)P = 0.003
OutcomeDifference (CI)P value
Vocal cord closure−20% (−33.3% to −6.7%)P = 0.005
Blood in the bronchoscopy field−28.6% (−44.9% to −12.2%)P = 0.002

Coughing, hemodynamic response to intubation

Comparable between the groups

Safety

OutcomeDifference (CI)P value
Desaturation−14.3% (−27.9% to −0.63%)P = 0.04

Postoperative sore throat

Comparable between the groups

Original publication

Comparison of Spontaneous Breathing Versus Paralyzed Technique During Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation in Anesthetized Children and Adolescents With Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis: Randomized Parallel Group Trial. Paediatr Anaesth. Published 9 June 2025. doi:10.1111/pan.15130

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.