Respiratory failure & ventilation

Conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy for intensive care unit patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ann Intensive CarePublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

COT did not reduce all-cause mortality in ICU patients.

Study context

Population
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients
Participants
10,632 patients · 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Comparison
Conservative vs liberal oxygen therapy
Outcome
Mortality rate

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Mortality
COT vs LOTRelative risk (95% CI)P value
30-day; I2 = 42%
1.01(0.94–1.09)
P = 0.78
90-day; I2 = 9%
1.01(0.95–1.08)
P = 0.69
Longest follow-up; I2 = 22%
1.00(0.95–1.06)
P = 0.95

Further pooled results

Mortality by ICU type, baseline P/F and actual PaO2 (subgroup)

No significant difference between the two groups

ICU LOS, hospital LOS, vasopressor-free time (VFT)

Not affected by conservative oxygen therapy (COT)

Days free from mechanical ventilation support (MVF)

Affected by COT

Original publication

Conservative versus liberal oxygen therapy for intensive care unit patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intensive Care. Published 26 April 2024. doi:10.1186/s13613-024-01300-7

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.