Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anaesthesia regimens for paediatric strabismus surgery based on multicentre retrospective cohort data from Japan

BJA OpenPublished Cost-effectiveness analysis based on retrospective cohort data

Authors' conclusion

TIVA with DEX alone is the most cost-effective regimen for preventing POV in paediatric strabismus surgery in the current Japanese public healthcare system.

Study context

Population
Children (aged 3–15 years) undergoing strabismus surgery at three institutions in Japan (February 2016-November 2023)
Participants
2,772 children
Exposure
Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with sub-Tenon block, dexamethasone (DEX) and ondansetron (OND) vs TIVA with sub-Tenon block and DEX
Outcome
Cost per averted postoperative vomiting (POV) (aPOV)
Follow-up
Within 24 hours post-surgery
Methodological detailsmulticentre, Japanese public healthcare payer perspective, sensitivity analyses
  • Multicentre
  • Japanese public healthcare payer perspective
  • Sensitivity analyses

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

aPOV rate (cost per aPOV within 24 h post-surgery) · 24 hours post-surgery
Incremental cost of adding OND
€21.2
ICER of adding OND (per averted POV (aPOV))
€400.6

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeTIVA+DEXTIVA+DEX+ONDTIVA only
Probability of cost-effectiveness (cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier, thresholds €0-€200 per aPOV)0% to 97.4%0% to 9.3%100% to 0%

Sensitivity analysis

OND cost was the most influential factor

Original publication

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anaesthesia regimens for paediatric strabismus surgery based on multicentre retrospective cohort data from Japan. BJA Open. Published 7 May 2025. doi:10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100404

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.