Haemodynamics, fluids & transfusion

Derivation and Validation of Operational Definitions From Claims Data for Identifying Cardiogenic Shock

Crit Care MedPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

A claims-based definition combining diagnostic codes with treatment-based criteria demonstrated high diagnostic performance for identifying CS. This approach enables reliable large-scale epidemiologic studies and long-term outcome assessments using administrative data and may facilitate system-level evaluation of critical care delivery in patients with CS.

Study context

Population
Patients from a single-center cardiac ICU (CICU) registry, a multicenter cardiogenic shock registry (RESCUE), and the nationwide administrative database of the Korean National Health Insurance ServiceTwo validation cohorts and a national claims population for application · CICU registry 10,156 · RESCUE registry 1,247 · National claims database (population-level application) 207,419
Participants
10,156 vs 1,247
Comparison
Claims-based operational definition for cardiogenic shock (CS) using administrative data against clinically adjudicated reference standards
  • CICU cohortn = 10,156
  • RESCUE cohortn = 1,247
Outcome
Diagnostic performance of the claims-based algorithm

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Test or modelSensitivitySpecificityOverall accuracy
CICU cohort0.890.900.90
RESCUE cohort0.95— not stated in the abstract— not stated in the abstract

Sensitivity

CICU cohort0.89
RESCUE cohort0.95

Specificity

CICU cohort0.90
RESCUE cohort— not stated in the abstract

Overall accuracy

CICU cohort0.90
RESCUE cohort— not stated in the abstract

— not stated in the abstract

Further findings

Patients with CS identified in the nationwide database

Patients with CS identified
207,419

Cumulative mortality in nationwide CS population

12 months
37.9%
5 years
49.9%
10 years
61.7%

Original publication

Derivation and Validation of Operational Definitions From Claims Data for Identifying Cardiogenic Shock. Crit Care Med. Published 5 October 2026. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007380

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.