Perioperative medicine & outcomes

Development of an automated, general-purpose prediction tool for postoperative respiratory failure using machine learning: A retrospective cohort study

J Clin AnesthPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

We developed a general-purpose, machine learning powered prediction tool with superior performance for research and quality-based definitions of postoperative respiratory failure.

Study context

Population
Anesthetic procedures from 1/2018 to 6/2021
Participants
101,455 anesthetic procedures
Exposure
RESPIRE model vs ARISCAT and SPORC-1
Outcome
Postoperative respiratory failure (Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine consensus definition)
Methodological detailsmachine learning (Random Forest), prediction model development and validation
  • Machine learning (Random Forest)
  • Prediction model development and validation

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Accuracy for postoperative respiratory failure (validation cohort)
GroupArea under the receiver operating curve (AUROC)
RESPIRE0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95)
ARISCAT0.82
SPORC-10.82

Area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC)

RESPIRE0.93 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95)
ARISCAT0.82
SPORC-10.82
  • RESPIRE vs ARISCAT: P for difference < 0.0001
  • RESPIRE vs SPORC-1: P for difference < 0.0001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

OutcomeRESPIREARISCATSPORC-1
PPV and false positive rate at comparable 80-90% sensitivitiesScore cut-offs determined in a separate test cohort
PPV11%, 95% CI: 10-12%4%4%
False positive rate12%, 95% CI: 12-13%37%37%

Respiratory quality metrics (NSQIP, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, CMS)

RESPIRE better predicted the established quality metrics for postoperative respiratory failure

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Development of an automated, general-purpose prediction tool for postoperative respiratory failure using machine learning: A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Anesth. Published 7 July 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111194

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.