Respiratory failure & ventilation

Diagnostic Methods for Pulmonary Congestion and Pleural Effusion: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Acta Anaesthesiol ScandPublished Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Study context

Population
Patients with pulmonary congestion or pleural effusion (acute HF); prospective diagnostic studies
Planned comparison
Chest radiography vs lung ultrasound vs computed tomography (CT) vs remote dielectric sensing (ReDS)
Primary endpoint
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios) for pulmonary congestion and pleural effusion
Methodological detailsPRISMA-P, hierarchical summary ROC model, QUADAS-2 risk of bias, Search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and other major databases, no language restrictions, beginning April 2025
  • PRISMA-P
  • Hierarchical summary ROC model
  • QUADAS-2 risk of bias
  • Search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and other major databases, no language restrictions, beginning April 2025

No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.

Original publication

Diagnostic Methods for Pulmonary Congestion and Pleural Effusion: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published May 2025. doi:10.1111/aas.70042

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.