Respiratory failure & ventilation
Diagnostic Methods for Pulmonary Congestion and Pleural Effusion: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Study context
- Population
- Patients with pulmonary congestion or pleural effusion (acute HF); prospective diagnostic studies
- Planned comparison
- Chest radiography vs lung ultrasound vs computed tomography (CT) vs remote dielectric sensing (ReDS)
- Primary endpoint
- Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios) for pulmonary congestion and pleural effusion
Methodological detailsPRISMA-P, hierarchical summary ROC model, QUADAS-2 risk of bias, Search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and other major databases, no language restrictions, beginning April 2025
- PRISMA-P
- Hierarchical summary ROC model
- QUADAS-2 risk of bias
- Search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and other major databases, no language restrictions, beginning April 2025
No results yet. This paper sets out the design of a trial; its results are to come.
Original publication
Diagnostic Methods for Pulmonary Congestion and Pleural Effusion: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. Published May 2025. doi:10. 1111/ aas. 70042
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →