Respiratory failure & ventilation

Effectiveness of bundle of care on tolerance of awake-prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory failure. A multicenter observational study

Intensive Care MedPublished Secondary analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In the evaluated population of patients with COVID-19-related ARF, implementing a bundle-of-care strategy was associated with a longer AW-PP exposure and a reduced risk of endotracheal intubation.

Study context

Population
Patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), encouraged to awake prone positioning
Participants
499 patients
Comparison
Bundle of care vs no bundle
  • Bundlen = 197
  • Controln = 302reference
Primary endpoint
Duration of awake prone positioning (hours/day)
Methodological detailsInverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), double-robust, mixed-effects model, Directed acyclic graphs used to identify variables related to exposure and outcomes
  • IPTW
  • Double-robust
  • Mixed-effects model
  • Directed acyclic graphs used to identify variables related to exposure and outcomes

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Awake prone positioning duration

Regression coefficient

IPTW
3.39 (95% CI 1.67–5.11)
DR
3.35 (95% CI 1.55–5.14)
Traditional regression (TR)
3.95 (95% CI 2.63–5.28)
Mixed-effects model (MEM)
3.72 (95% CI 2.5–4.94)

Secondary outcomes

Endotracheal intubation

OR (95% CI), IPTW
0.34 (0.15-0.76)
OR (95% CI), DR
0.23 (0.10-0.50)
OR (95% CI), TR
0.42 (0.23-0.77)
OR (95% CI), MEM
0.48 (0.16-0.49)
  • Exposure (bundle) vs no bundle (control)

In-hospital mortality

OR (95% CI), IPTW
0.38 (0.11-1.27)
OR (95% CI), DR
0.43 (0.14-1.26)
OR (95% CI), TR
0.47 (0.22-0.91)
OR (95% CI), MEM
0.46 (0.12-1.43)
  • Exposure (bundle) vs no bundle (control)

Original publication

Effectiveness of bundle of care on tolerance of awake-prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory failure. A multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. Published 17 February 2025. doi:10.1007/s00134-025-07804-5

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.