Respiratory failure & ventilation

Effects of aggressive and conservative strategies for mechanical ventilation liberation

J Crit CarePublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

Aggressive liberation may improve ventilator free and ICU free days with little impact on mortality in patients with SOFA score < 12.

Study context

Population
Mechanically ventilated patients, MIMIC-IV database (version 1.0)
Participants
7,433 participants
Exposure
Aggressive vs conservative liberation from lung protective ventilation, relative to usual care
Outcome
Time to first liberation attempt
Methodological detailsinverse probability weighting, incremental propensity interventions
  • Inverse probability weighting
  • Incremental propensity interventions

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Usual care

43

h

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeIncrease (days) (0.95 CI)
ICU-free days, full cohortAggressive vs Usual care0.9 ([0.8,1.0])
Ventilator free days, full cohortAggressive vs Usual care0.82 ([0.67,0.97])
OutcomeDifference between minimum and maximum rates (0.95 CI)
In-hospital mortality, full cohortAggressive vs Usual care · minimal effect on mortality0.3% ([−0.2%,0.8%])
OutcomeAggressiveConservative
In-hospital mortality, baseline SOFA≥ 12 (subgroup, n = 1355)58.5% (0.95 CI (55.7%,61.2%))55.1% (0.95 CI (51.6%,58.6%))

In-hospital mortality, baseline SOFA≥ 12 (subgroup, n = 1355)

Aggressive liberation moderately increased mortality vs conservative

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

Effects of aggressive and conservative strategies for mechanical ventilation liberation. J Crit Care. Published 14 February 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154275

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.