Sepsis & infection

Efficacy of Levosimendan in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Septic Cardiomyopathy

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Compared with dobutamine, levosimendan was more effective at improving cardiac function, reducing myocardial injury, and reducing mechanical ventilation time in patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy.

Study context

Population
Patients with severe septic cardiomyopathy (LVEF ≤35%), Department of Critical Medicine, Baoding, China, September 2018 to September 2021
Participants
30 patients
Comparison
Levosimendan vs dobutamine
Primary endpoint
28-day mortality
Follow-up
28 days
Methodological detailsprospective, single-blind
  • Prospective
  • Single-blind

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

  • Difference in 28-day mortality between groups not statistically significant

Further findings

Cardiac index, LVEF, stroke volume index (SVI), fluid volume, norepinephrine dose · 24th hour after treatment

CI, LVEF, SVI and fluid volume higher, norepinephrine dose lower in the levosimendan group vs the dobutamine group

Cardiac troponin I · third day of treatment

Lower in the levosimendan group vs the dobutamine group

Intensive care unit (ICU) stay and ICU treatment cost

Differences between groups not statistically significant

Ventilator application time

Significantly shorter in the levosimendan group vs the dobutamine group

Original publication

Efficacy of Levosimendan in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Septic Cardiomyopathy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 6 November 2022. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2022.10.032

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.