Respiratory failure & ventilation

Electrical impedance tomography for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Clin Monit ComputPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials and observational studies

Pooled result · MortalityResult — go to the resultRelative risk 0.64 95% CI 0.45–0.91

Authors' conclusion

EIT-guided PEEP titration was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among critically ill patients with ARDS (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91).

Study context

Population
Patients with ARDS4 studies (3 RCTs, 1 observational), all single-centre
Participants
271 patients
Comparison
EIT-guided PEEP titration vs other strategies
Outcome
Mortality
Methodological detailsPRISMA, Main limitation: potential bias in selecting reported outcomes
  • PRISMA
  • Main limitation: potential bias in selecting reported outcomes

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Relative risk

0.64

95% CI 0.45–0.91

EIT-guided PEEP titration vs Other strategies
RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.45–0.91)

Further pooled results

Days of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), weaning success, barotrauma, driving pressure, mechanical power, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score

No significant differences

Original publication

Electrical impedance tomography for PEEP titration in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. Published 26 February 2025. doi:10.1007/s10877-025-01266-2

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.