Pediatric anesthesia & critical care

Evaluation of the non-invasive Temple Touch Pro temperature monitoring system compared with oesophageal temperature in paediatric anaesthesia (PETER PAN)): A prospective observational study

Eur J AnaesthesiolPublished Prospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

Although the Temple Touch Pro sensor showed acceptable accuracy after allowing for an equilibration time, it still needs further investigation for routine use in children.

Study context

Population
Children aged 6 years or younger scheduled for noncardiac surgery, university hospital, April–July 2021
Participants
100 children · 6,766 data pairs
Exposure
Noninvasive Temple Touch Pro vs oesophageal core temperature
Outcome
Agreement by Bland-Altman comparison with multiple measurements
Methodological detailsmethod-comparison (Bland-Altman), single-centre
  • Method-comparison (Bland-Altman)
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Agreement of Temple Touch Pro with oesophageal temperature (Bland-Altman, multiple measurements)

Mean difference

−0.07°C

95% CI −0.15 to +0.05

Limits of agreement

−1.00 and +0.85°C

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Secondary outcomes

Agreement after excluding a 13-min equilibration time (post hoc)

Mean difference
−0.04°C (95% CI −0.08 to +0.01)
Limits of agreement
−0.68 and +0.60°C
  • Posthoc

Concordance correlation coefficient

Concordance correlation coefficient
0.83 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.84)

Difference between skin sensor and oesophageal reference over time

Difference increased over time
−0.05°C per hour

Subgroups (temperature range, age, sex, sensor side)

No clinically relevant differences

Depth of artery vs trueness

Depth of artery negatively correlated with trueness
0.03°C per millimetre

Original publication

Evaluation of the non-invasive Temple Touch Pro temperature monitoring system compared with oesophageal temperature in paediatric anaesthesia (PETER PAN)): A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. Published 9 January 2023. doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000001796

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.