Expert consensus‑based clinical practice guidelines for nutritional support in the intensive care unit: the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) and the French-Speaking Group of Pediatric Emergency Physicians and Intensivists (GFRUP)
Methodological detailsexpert consensus, GRADE methodology, GRADE methodology used by experts from SRLF, SFNCM and GFRUP, 24 PICO questions, resulting in 34 adult and 29 pediatric recommendations, Adult recommendations: 3 high-level evidence, 12 moderate-level evidence, 19 expert opinion, Pediatric recommendations: one high-level evidence, five moderate-level evidence, 23 expert opinion, All recommendations achieved strong agreement among the experts
- Expert consensus
- GRADE methodology
- GRADE methodology used by experts from SRLF, SFNCM and GFRUP
- 24 PICO questions, resulting in 34 adult and 29 pediatric recommendations
- Adult recommendations: 3 high-level evidence, 12 moderate-level evidence, 19 expert opinion
- Pediatric recommendations: one high-level evidence, five moderate-level evidence, 23 expert opinion
- All recommendations achieved strong agreement among the experts
Scope
As issued by the authors
Nutritional support in critically ill adults and children (excluding neonates and burn patients) unable to maintain an adequate oral intake
Original publication
Expert consensus‑based clinical practice guidelines for nutritional support in the intensive care unit: the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF) and the French-Speaking Group of Pediatric Emergency Physicians and Intensivists (GFRUP). Ann Intensive Care. Published 15 July 2025. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →