Neuroanesthesia & neurocritical care

Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials

J Clin Monit ComputPublished Prospective observational study

Authors' conclusion

Moreover, when using supramaximal stimulation, short ISI's (i.e. 1ms or 1.5ms) can be the optimal ISI for obtaining the highest mTc-MEP amplitude.

Study context

Population
Consecutive patients undergoing scoliosis surgery with mTc-MEP monitoring9 excluded, 38 analysed
Participants
47 patients
Exposure
Setting 1 vs setting 2 for supramaximal mTc-MEP stimulation
Outcome
Feasibility of supramaximal stimulation of mTc-MEP
Methodological detailsconsecutive patients, within-patient comparison of two stimulation settings
  • Consecutive patients
  • Within-patient comparison of two stimulation settings

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Supramaximal stimulation achieved

Setting 1

38

events

Setting 2

68.42%

26 events

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Supramaximal stimulation with ≥ 20 V below maximum output — Setting 2
38.46%

Elicitability of mTc-MEPs

In one patient, mTc-MEPs elicitable in more muscles with setting 1

mTc-MEP amplitude

Amplitudes not significantly different

Optimal interstimulus interval (ISI) (1ms-4ms), setting 1

Optimal ISIs differed widely

Original publication

Feasibility and optimal choice of stimulation parameters for supramaximal stimulation of motor evoked potentials. J Clin Monit Comput. Published 13 January 2023. doi:10.1007/s10877-022-00972-5

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.