ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

Health Care Disparities and Critical Illnesses-Related Mortality in the United States

Crit Care MedPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

Critical illness mortality is significantly associated with indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage. The SDI appears to be a more effective tool than the SVI for guiding resource allocation.

Study context

Population
County-level populations of all ages across the US, 2015 to 2019
Exposure
Higher vs lower social vulnerability index and social deprivation index
Outcome
Age-adjusted critical illness-related mortality (respiratory, cardiac, neurologic, renal/gastrointestinal)
Methodological detailscounty-level data
  • County-level data

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Critical illness-related mortality associated with SVI and SDI (cardiac, strongest)
Cardiac critical illnesses
Rate ratio (95% CI)
SDI
1.52(1.48–1.57)
SVI
1.43(1.39–1.47)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Sepsis

IRR (95% CI)
SVI1.63 (1.58–1.69)
SDI1.75 (1.70–1.80)

Cardiac arrest

IRR (95% CI)
SVI1.92 (1.80–2.04)
SDI1.98 (1.86–2.10)

Anoxic brain damage

IRR (95% CI)
SVI1.62 (1.45–1.81)
SDI1.60 (1.45–1.76)

Acute hepatic failure

IRR (95% CI)
SVI1.51 (0.92–2.46)
SDI1.49 (1.08–2.05)

Mortality rates per 100,000 by category

Cardiac
212.4 (95% CI, 212.2-212.6)
Respiratory
116.8 (95% CI, 116.7-117.0)
Neurologic
30.8 (95% CI, 30.8-30.9)
Renal/gastrointestinal
25.2 (95% CI, 25.1-25.3)
Mortality greater among adults ≥65 years, males, Black or African American individuals, rural residents

Original publication

Health Care Disparities and Critical Illnesses-Related Mortality in the United States. Crit Care Med. Published 13 February 2025. doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006620

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.