Regional anesthesia

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks for shoulder surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

J Clin AnesthPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

There is conclusive evidence that the extrafascial technique (high-level); lower concentration technique (moderate-level); and the supraclavicular blockade (low-level) are less detrimental to hemidiaphragmatic paralysis than the conventional ISB. However, the results for other comparisons were not definitive.

Study context

Population
Adults undergoing shoulder surgery with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blockade, incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis reported
Participants
1,737 adults · 28 RCTs
Comparison
Diaphragm-sparing regional techniques vs conventional interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB)
Outcome
Incidence of complete hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
Methodological detailsmeta-regression, trial sequential analysis, GRADE methodology, 22 RCTs eligible for meta-analysis; six regional techniques analysed
  • Meta-regression
  • Trial sequential analysis
  • GRADE methodology
  • 22 RCTs eligible for meta-analysis; six regional techniques analysed

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis · short-term follow-up
Low-volume ISB vs Conventional ISBRelative risk (95 % CI)P value
I2 = 80 %
0.62(0.42–0.91)
P = 0.02
Low-volume ISB vs Conventional ISBAbsolute risk difference (95 % CI)
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
- 0.30(−0.39 to −0.20)

%

Infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks reduced incidence vs conventional ISB
97
Extrafascial ISB reduced incidence vs conventional ISB
64
Lower concentration ISB reduced incidence vs conventional ISB
57
Supraclavicular block reduced incidence vs conventional ISB
46

Original publication

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks for shoulder surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Anesth. Published 9 June 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111874

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.