Haemodynamics, fluids & transfusion
Hypotension Prediction Index versus High Mean Arterial Pressure Target for Preventing Intraoperative Hypotension: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors' conclusion
HPI-guided management was not superior to a proactive MAP less than or equal to 73 mmHg strategy.
Study context
- Population
- Adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery requiring invasive arterial monitoringequally randomized
- Participants
- 100 adults
- Comparison
- Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI)-guided management vs higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) target
- Primary endpoint
- Time-weighted average hypotension (MAP <65 mmHg)
Methodological detailsopen-label, parallel-group, two centers
- Open-label
- Parallel-group
- Two centers
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
P = 0.119
Secondary outcomes
Area under the threshold for hypotension
P = 0.172
| Outcome | P value |
|---|---|
| Time-weighted average hypertension (MAP >100 mmHg)Did not differ significantly | P = 0.555 |
Norepinephrine dose, hospital LOS, 30-day mortality
- Did not differ significantly
Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.
Original publication
Hypotension Prediction Index versus High Mean Arterial Pressure Target for Preventing Intraoperative Hypotension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. Published 29 September 2026. doi:10. 1097/ aln. 0000000000006335
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →