Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Is Prior Cardiac Surgery a Risk Factor for Patients in Aortic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

J Cardiothorac Vasc AnesthPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis

Pooled result · In-hospital mortalityResult — go to the resultOdds ratio 0.55 95% CI 0.50–0.60

Authors' conclusion

This study shows that RAS is associated with significantly elevated in-hospital mortality and increased perioperative risks, particularly pronounced in repeat sternotomy root replacement procedures. However, prior cardiac surgery did not diminish the long-term benefits of aortic surgery.

Study context

Population
Patients undergoing aortic surgery, with vs without prior cardiac surgery
Participants
31,631 patients · 19 studies
Comparison
Primary aortic surgery vs repeat sternotomy aortic surgery
Outcome
In-hospital mortality

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Odds ratio

0.55

95% CI 0.50–0.60

P < 0.001

By group

PAS vs RAS
OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.50–0.60); P < 0.001

Further pooled results

OutcomePASRASOR (95% CI)P value
Re-exploration for bleeding7.2%9.4%0.76 (0.68–0.84)P < 0.001
Renal failure13.3%15.8%0.73 (0.65–0.81)P < 0.001
Short-term survival · 2 yearsShort-term survival favoured PAS62.6%55.2%0.74 (0.58–0.93)P = 0.01
Long-term survival · 10 yearsLong-term survival converged between groups · particularly after propensity score matching14.8%12.7%0.82 (0.60–1.13)P = 0.23
In-hospital mortality, aortic root surgery (subgroup)5.0%8.4%0.55 (0.50–0.61)P < 0.001
In-hospital mortality, aortic arch surgery (subgroup)Benefit less pronounced than in root procedures8.4%11.9%0.60 (0.39–0.94)P = 0.026

Safety

OutcomePASRASOR (95% CI)P value
Re-exploration for bleeding7.2%9.4%0.76 (0.68–0.84)P < 0.001
Renal failure13.3%15.8%0.73 (0.65–0.81)P < 0.001
Deep sternal wound infection0.7%2.8%0.47 (0.37–0.60)P < 0.001

Original publication

Is Prior Cardiac Surgery a Risk Factor for Patients in Aortic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Published 2 July 2025. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.056

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.