Cardiothoracic & vascular anesthesia

Magnitude and pattern of breathing effort during spontaneous breathing trials after cardiac surgery: a physiological model of sustained breathing effort despite diaphragm dysfunction

Crit CarePublished Prospective physiological study

Authors' conclusion

Stable patients after cardiac surgery show an increase in respiratory drive and inspiratory effort with increasing load despite signs consistent with diaphragm dysfunction. Expiratory muscle use is common, it is associated with decreased diaphragm activity, higher intraoperative dose of opioids and decreases after extubation.

Study context

Population
Patients after cardiac surgery undergoing SBT
Participants
30 patients
Exposure
PS5PEEP5 vs CPAP0 vs T-piece SBT
Outcome
Magnitude and pattern of breathing effort (pressure-time product per minute)
Methodological detailsrandomised order crossover of 3 SBT modalities
  • Randomised order crossover of 3 SBT modalities

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Pressure-time product per minute

P < 0.001

Estimated mean global inspiratory effort during un-assisted modalities
138.5 (120.6,156.3) cmH2O•sec/min

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Transdiaphragmatic pressure — PS5PEEP5 vs CPAP0, T-piece

P < 0.001

Maximum inspiratory pressure (Mueller maneuver)

Maximum inspiratory pressure
- 29.8 ± −12.6 cmH2O

Expiratory muscle effort (gastric pressure rise)

Contribution to esophageal pressure drop during inspiration under mechanical ventilation
31-37%
Association with higher intraoperative opioid dose
P = 0.004
Inverse association with respiratory muscle function
P = 0.001
Lower after extubation

Tension-time indices

Within the higher end of a non-fatiguing range

Safety

Extubation

All patients successfully extubated

Original publication

Magnitude and pattern of breathing effort during spontaneous breathing trials after cardiac surgery: a physiological model of sustained breathing effort despite diaphragm dysfunction. Crit Care. Published 25 April 2026. doi:10.1186/s13054-026-06004-x

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.