Respiratory failure & ventilation

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in critical care patients with and without obesity: a prospective randomized crossover study

Ann Intensive CarePublished Randomised crossover study

Authors' conclusion

In patients with obesity, NAVA ventilation is feasible and safe, improves patient-ventilator interactions and oxygenation, with an increase ventilatory variability compared to PSV. The effects of NAVA are comparable in patients with and without obesity.

Study context

Population
ICU patients on mechanical ventilation, with and without obesityall completed · with 10 · without 11
Comparison
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) vs Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), in patients with vs without obesity
Primary endpoint
Feasibility and safety of NAVA in patients with obesity; patient-ventilator interactions (trigger delay, inspiratory time in excess, rate and type of dyssynchrony)
Methodological detailsprospective, 1790 ± 873 respiratory cycles analysed per patient
  • Prospective
  • 1790 ± 873 respiratory cycles analysed per patient

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Patient-ventilator interactions, patients with obesity
GroupValueTrigger delayInspiratory time in excessIneffective effortsGlobal dyssynchrony index
NAVAmedian 0 (IQR 0–5) ms0 [0-5] ms96 [94-102] ms0 [0-0.03] events/min2.2% [1.1-4.4]
PSVmedian 106 (IQR 34–125) ms106 [34-125] ms145 [137-202] ms0.33 [0.23-0.37] events/min3.7% [2.4-5.6]

Value

NAVAmedian 0 (IQR 0–5) ms
PSVmedian 106 (IQR 34–125) ms

Trigger delay

NAVA0 [0-5] ms
PSV106 [34-125] ms

Inspiratory time in excess

NAVA96 [94-102] ms
PSV145 [137-202] ms

Ineffective efforts

NAVA0 [0-0.03] events/min
PSV0.33 [0.23-0.37] events/min

Global dyssynchrony index

NAVA2.2% [1.1-4.4]
PSV3.7% [2.4-5.6]
  • NAVA vs PSV: P < 0.05
  • NAVA vs PSV: P < 0.01
  • NAVA vs PSV: P < 0.05
  • NAVA vs PSV: P = 0.68 — similar in both modes

Further findings

PaO2/FiO2 ratio, patients with obesity · end of each 30-min period · significantly increased in NAVA

P < 0.05

OutcomeNAVAPSVP value
Tidal volume, patients with obesitySignificantly lower during NAVA6.7 (bracketed range 5.9–7.1) mL/kg predicted body weight7.2 (bracketed range 6.2–8.2) mL/kgP < 0.05
Ventilatory variability (mean inspiratory airway pressure), patients with obesity16% (bracketed range 11–21)4% (bracketed range 2–4)

Ventilatory variability (mean inspiratory airway pressure), patients with obesity

Significantly higher with NAVA

Patients without obesity

Results similar in patients without obesity; obesity factor never significant

Safety

No adverse event in patients with and without obesity in both modes

Original publication

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in critical care patients with and without obesity: a prospective randomized crossover study. Ann Intensive Care. Published 29 August 2025. doi:10.1186/s13613-025-01552-x

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.