ICU sedation, delirium & recovery

New prognostic score for mortality in critically ill patients. Development and validation

J Crit CarePublished Prognostic model development and validation study

Authors' conclusion

A validated NMP model was developed using nine additional risk factors alongside APACHE II.

Study context

Population
Adults (>18 years) admitted to the ICU, 167 Spanish hospitals (193 ICUs), over 7 years91,777 estimation
Participants
137,666 adults
Comparison
New prognostic model vs APACHE II alone
Outcome
ICU mortality
Methodological detailspost-hoc analysis, multicentre, prospective data, multivariable logistic regression, separate validation cohort
  • Post-hoc analysis
  • Multicentre
  • Prospective data
  • Multivariable logistic regression
  • Separate validation cohort

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Discrimination for ICU mortality
Test or modelAUROC
New model0.872
APACHE II0.826

AUROC

New model0.872
APACHE II0.826

%

ICU mortality (overall)
10.8
Reclassification improvement over APACHE II
52
Survivors reclassified
19.4
Non-survivors reclassified
32.75

Original publication

New prognostic score for mortality in critically ill patients. Development and validation. J Crit Care. Published 1 August 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155191

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.