Respiratory failure & ventilation

Non-invasive respiratory supports and criteria for intubation in randomised trials of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Lancet Respir MedPublished Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Authors' conclusion

Compared with SOT, CPAP, HFNC, and bilevel NIPPV probably reduce intubation, and CPAP and HFNC may reduce mortality. Criteria for intubation were common but were not associated with differences in treatment efficacy.

Study context

Population
Adults (≥18 years) with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF)
Participants
9,704 adults · 44 trials
Comparison
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and bilevel non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) vs standard oxygen therapy (SOT); effect of intubation criteria
Outcome
Intubation and mortality
Methodological detailsnetwork meta-regression, pre-registered protocol, GRADE certainty
  • Network meta-regression
  • Pre-registered protocol
  • GRADE certainty

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Intubation
CrI; moderate certainty
Each group vs SOTOdds ratio (95% CrI)
CPAP
0.45(0.27–0.72)
HFNC
0.61(0.42–0.86)
Bilevel NIPPV
0.60(0.39–0.89)

Further pooled results

OutcomeOR (95% CrI)
MortalityCPAP vs SOT · CrI; low certainty · CrI0.73 (0.55–0.95)
MortalityHFNC vs SOT · CrI; low certainty · CrI0.83 (0.66–0.98)
MortalityBilevel NIPPV vs SOT · CrI; low certainty · CrI0.93 (0.71–1.17)
  • Mortality: 8789 patients, 34 trials

Intubation criteria and treatment effects (network meta-regression)

Intubation criteria present in trials
37 (84%)
Criteria for intubation not associated with differences in treatment effects

Original publication

Non-invasive respiratory supports and criteria for intubation in randomised trials of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. Published 22 April 2026. doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(26)00039-1

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.